Reducing bias without prejudicing sign

Peter Hall*, Brett Presnell, Berwin A. Turlach

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Jackknife and bootstrap bias corrections are based on a differencing argument which does not necessarily respect the sign of the true parameter value. Depending on sampling variability they can over-correct, producing a final estimator that is negative when one knows on physical grounds that it should be positive. To overcome this problem we suggest a simple, alternative bootstrap approach, based on biased-bootstrap methods. Our technique has similar properties to the standard uniform-bootstrap method in cases where the latter does not endanger sign, but it respects sign in a canonical way when the standard method disregards it.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)507-518
    Number of pages12
    JournalAnnals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics
    Volume52
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2000

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Reducing bias without prejudicing sign'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this