Reflecting on the ‘General Part’ When There Is Systemic Injustice: Do We Inadvertently Facilitate Overcriminalisation of First Peoples in Australia?

Mary Spiers Williams

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

Abstract

This chapter examines how the theory and method of the ‘general part’ of criminal law might contribute to systemic bias against First Peoples. Australian legal practitioner admission rules mandate teaching this theory, leading criminal law courses to emphasise doctrinal analysis and students to prioritise mastering analysis of the elements of offences and defences. Informed by the author’s experiences in legal education and criminal law practice, the chapter explores how such training impacts the criminal justice system’s capacity to address serious social issues and potentially fosters discrimination. The author proposes that lawyers develop reflexive practices and question the principles taught to them. Ultimately, the chapter calls for new tools to address structural injustice to prepare the next generation of lawyers to undertake essential systemic reform.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationLegal Education Through an Indigenous Lens
Subtitle of host publicationDecolonising the Law School
EditorsNicole Watson, Heather Douglas
Place of PublicationOxon
PublisherRoutledge, Taylor & Francis Group
Chapter13
Pages207-229
Edition1st
ISBN (Electronic)978-1-003-47340-4
ISBN (Print)978-1-032-75315-7, 978-1-032-75316-4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2024

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Reflecting on the ‘General Part’ When There Is Systemic Injustice: Do We Inadvertently Facilitate Overcriminalisation of First Peoples in Australia?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this