Reflections on, and responses to, managerial adverse reactions to healthcare advocacy by psychiatrists and trainees

Jeffrey C.L. Looi*, Stephen Allison, Tarun Bastiampillai

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    3 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Objective: For psychiatrists and trainees, to reflect upon adverse managerial reactions to healthcare advocacy about patient care and safety, drawing upon examples from general healthcare settings, and to share approaches to addressing these reactions. Conclusions: Psychiatrists and trainees engaging in healthcare advocacy may face adverse responses from healthcare management, with personal and professional consequences. Advocates need to consider counterstrategies to negative actions by management that may include workplace incivility, bullying and harassment. Health advocacy is more effective within a network of peers, patients and the broader community, including medico-political professional organisations, such as the Australian Medical Association, Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists, and Unions. These organisations should advocate openness to doctors highlighting healthcare safety and quality, as well as prevention of workplace bullying.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)158-161
    Number of pages4
    JournalAustralasian Psychiatry
    Volume30
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Apr 2022

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Reflections on, and responses to, managerial adverse reactions to healthcare advocacy by psychiatrists and trainees'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this