TY - JOUR
T1 - Reflections on four decades of land restoration in Australia
AU - Campbell, Andrew
AU - Alexandra, Jason
AU - Curtis, David
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Australian Rangeland Society 2017.
PY - 2017
Y1 - 2017
N2 - The past four decades have seen a transformative process in Australian agriculture - the gradual incorporation of conservation practices such as ecological restoration, revegetation and agroforestry as a response to land degradation. Although actions have been impressive they remain fragmented, are confined to particular districts or properties and run the risk of not being built upon in the future. This paper traces the history of this movement and draws out lessons and implications for future policy development and research. Landscape-scale restoration and the integration of conservation into farming landscapes have been recognised as a global imperative for decades, for which Australia has generated many innovations - in the technical, social and policy domains. Scanning the 'big picture', we identify many pixels of best practice in policy, incentives, planning, regulation and on-ground practice. We wonder why we have not pulled these together, to work in concert over time. If we had, Australia would have a world's best natural resource management framework. However, we have neither integrated these elements at multiple scales nor sustained them. Unfortunately, although we are excellent at innovating, we have been equally good at forgetting. Progress remains partial, patchy and slow. Too often, we have made gains then gone backwards, reflecting a tendency towards policy adhockery and amnesia. With Australia's continuing depreciation of institutional memory, we risk losing critical capabilities for making sound policy decisions. Australian expertise in revegetation, restoration and regeneration of landscapes remains formidable however, with an enormous amount to offer the world. We are still learning to live and farm more sustainably, but we have made big strides over the last four decades. The challenge will be to maintain the momentum and provide adequate succession so future generations continue the work.
AB - The past four decades have seen a transformative process in Australian agriculture - the gradual incorporation of conservation practices such as ecological restoration, revegetation and agroforestry as a response to land degradation. Although actions have been impressive they remain fragmented, are confined to particular districts or properties and run the risk of not being built upon in the future. This paper traces the history of this movement and draws out lessons and implications for future policy development and research. Landscape-scale restoration and the integration of conservation into farming landscapes have been recognised as a global imperative for decades, for which Australia has generated many innovations - in the technical, social and policy domains. Scanning the 'big picture', we identify many pixels of best practice in policy, incentives, planning, regulation and on-ground practice. We wonder why we have not pulled these together, to work in concert over time. If we had, Australia would have a world's best natural resource management framework. However, we have neither integrated these elements at multiple scales nor sustained them. Unfortunately, although we are excellent at innovating, we have been equally good at forgetting. Progress remains partial, patchy and slow. Too often, we have made gains then gone backwards, reflecting a tendency towards policy adhockery and amnesia. With Australia's continuing depreciation of institutional memory, we risk losing critical capabilities for making sound policy decisions. Australian expertise in revegetation, restoration and regeneration of landscapes remains formidable however, with an enormous amount to offer the world. We are still learning to live and farm more sustainably, but we have made big strides over the last four decades. The challenge will be to maintain the momentum and provide adequate succession so future generations continue the work.
KW - agroforestry
KW - conservation
KW - cropping industry
KW - ecological restoration
KW - landcare
KW - natural resource management
KW - pastoral industry
KW - revegetation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85041622717&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1071/RJ17056
DO - 10.1071/RJ17056
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85041622717
SN - 1036-9872
VL - 39
SP - 405
EP - 416
JO - Rangeland Journal
JF - Rangeland Journal
IS - 5-6
ER -