Reformers and the Rentier State: Re-Evaluating the Co-Optation Mechanism in Rentier State Theory

Jessie Moritz*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    10 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    The oil and gas-rich states of the Gulf Cooperation Council have long been treated as exceptional, where distributions of rent-based wealth to society assumedly preclude political dissent. Yet, by examining informal and formal opposition in Qatar, Bahrain, and Oman since 2011, this article disputes the effectiveness of this “co-optation mechanism” at the sub-national level. Drawing from 135 semi-structured interviews conducted with citizens of these states, it uncovers evidence of challenges to state authority even among nationals who should theoretically be co-opted. In examining the limits of rent-based co-optation, the article highlights two key political dynamics that have demonstrated a capacity to overpower rent-based incentives to remain politically inactive: ideology and repression. Societies, then, were far from quiescent, and this research examines the networks and dynamics that have allowed citizens to challenge state authority.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)46-64
    Number of pages19
    JournalJournal of Arabian Studies
    Volume8
    Issue numbersup1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 6 Dec 2018

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Reformers and the Rentier State: Re-Evaluating the Co-Optation Mechanism in Rentier State Theory'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this