Abstract
The oil and gas-rich states of the Gulf Cooperation Council have long been treated as exceptional, where distributions of rent-based wealth to society assumedly preclude political dissent. Yet, by examining informal and formal opposition in Qatar, Bahrain, and Oman since 2011, this article disputes the effectiveness of this “co-optation mechanism” at the sub-national level. Drawing from 135 semi-structured interviews conducted with citizens of these states, it uncovers evidence of challenges to state authority even among nationals who should theoretically be co-opted. In examining the limits of rent-based co-optation, the article highlights two key political dynamics that have demonstrated a capacity to overpower rent-based incentives to remain politically inactive: ideology and repression. Societies, then, were far from quiescent, and this research examines the networks and dynamics that have allowed citizens to challenge state authority.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 46-64 |
| Number of pages | 19 |
| Journal | Journal of Arabian Studies |
| Volume | 8 |
| Issue number | sup1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 6 Dec 2018 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Reformers and the Rentier State: Re-Evaluating the Co-Optation Mechanism in Rentier State Theory'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver