Regulating the post-employment of public officials: Australian experience in an international context

Richard Mulgan*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    3 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    The potential abuse of power by public officials after they have left government employment became a major issue in Australia with the appointment of two recently retired senior federal ministers to lucrative positions with firms which had close dealings with their former departments. The cases raise important questions about the regulation of ‘the revolving door’ which is an increasing feature of governance as the public and private sectors move more closely together. Australian Commonwealth rules relating to both ministers and public servants are analysed in the context of international practice and as part of the wider issue of conflict of interest. Four types of conflict are relevant to post-employment: ingratiation, profiteering, influence, and switching sides. The regulation of each type is discussed and Australian practice seen to be deficient in certain respects, particularly in relation to ministers. Regulation in this area faces two general challenges: definition of the offence and the comparative absence of oversight and sanctions. But international exemplars offer prospects for strengthening Australia's ethical regime.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)201-216
    Number of pages16
    JournalAustralian Journal of Public Administration
    Volume80
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Jun 2021

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Regulating the post-employment of public officials: Australian experience in an international context'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this