Regulating Torts

Jane Stapleton*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

    6 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    This chapter raises three points about regulating torts. First, using a regulatory lens as a broad supplemental perspective can illuminate legal research in some ways. It enables one to ask fruitful questions; for example, why tort remedies are not twinned with accountability regimes. Nevertheless, the regulatory lens can distort the picture by tending to identify incorrectly the concerns that influence those who construct the private law of torts: judges and the counsel that address them. Second, there is a real danger that the regulatory lens will be used to downgrade private law to the role of mere servant to a multi-layered system of governance. Third, in contrast to the claims Hugh Collins makes for contract law, in recent years tort law has not been called upon to play a significantly more pivotal role in the governance mechanisms of society than beforehand.

    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationRegulating Law
    PublisherOxford University Press
    ISBN (Electronic)9780191698903
    ISBN (Print)0199264074, 9780199264070
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 27 May 2004

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Regulating Torts'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this