Relative sea-level change and postglacial isostatic adjustment along the coast of south Devon, United Kingdom

Anthony C. Massey, W. Roland Gehrels*, Dan J. Charman, Glenn A. Milne, W. Richard Peltier, Kurt Lambeck, Katherine A. Selby

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    33 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Previous sea-level studies suggest that southwest Britain has the fastest subsiding coastline in the United Kingdom, but tide-gauge data, GPS and gravity measurements and geophysical models show little evidence of anomalous subsidence in this region. In this paper we present 15 new sea-level index points from four coastal barrier systems in south Devon. Eight are from compaction-free basal sediments and others were corrected for autocompaction. Our data suggest that relative sea level along the south Devon coastline has risen by 21 ± 4 m during the past 9000 years. Sea-level rise slowed during the middle and late Holocene and a rise of 8 ± 1 m has occurred since ca. 7000 cal. yr BP. Anomalous ages for many rejected points are attributed to sediment reworking during barrier transgression. The relative sea-level history during the early and middle Holocene shows a good fit with geophysical model predictions, but the geological and modelled data diverge in the later Holocene. Unlike the geophysical models, sea-level index points cannot differentiate between late Holocene relative sea-level histories of south Devon and southwest Cornwall. It is suggested that this discrepancy can be resolved by obtaining additional high-quality sea-level index points covering the past 4000 years.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)415-433
    Number of pages19
    JournalJournal of Quaternary Science
    Volume23
    Issue number5
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Jul 2008

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Relative sea-level change and postglacial isostatic adjustment along the coast of south Devon, United Kingdom'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this