Abstract
This is an account of the approach to paraconsistency associated with relevant logic. The logic fde of first degree entailments is shown to arise naturally out of the deeper concerns of relevant logic. The relationship between relevant logic and resolution, and especially the disjunctive syllogism, is then examined. The relevant refusal to validate these inferences is defended, and finally it is suggested that more needs to be done towards a satisfactory theory of when they may nonetheless safely be used.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Inconsistency Tolerance |
| Editors | Leopoldo Bertossi, Anthony Hunter, Torsten Schaub |
| Pages | 270-293 |
| Number of pages | 24 |
| Publication status | Published - 2004 |
Publication series
| Name | Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) |
|---|---|
| Volume | 3300 LNCS |
| ISSN (Print) | 0302-9743 |
| ISSN (Electronic) | 1611-3349 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Relevant logic and paraconsistency'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver