Religion well explained? A response to commentaries on "Religion Re-explained"

    Research output: Contribution to journalLetterpeer-review

    4 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    This article responds to the commentaries on my Religion Re-explained. There is a common element running through many of the comments: ritual, its changing role as Pleistocene life became more complex, and the social factors that drove those changes cannot explain the content of religious narratives and of the doctrines those narratives turn into. For while there is much variation across religions, many or most involve supernatural agency and forces. Surely this could be such a common theme only if belief in the supernatural was in some way natural to the human mind. In this response, I clarify and expand an alternative account, while responding as well to more particular questions and objections.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)452-460
    JournalReligion, Brain & Behavior
    Volume8
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2018

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Religion well explained? A response to commentaries on "Religion Re-explained"'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this