Reply to Boogert et al.: The devil is unlikely to be in association or distraction

Reply to Boogert et al. The devil is unlikely to be in association or distraction

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Letter › peer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	E274
Journal	Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
Volume	110
Issue number	4
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1220564110
Publication status	Published - 22 Jan 2013
Externally published	Yes

@article{2be08dded71d43ac97af0e9dac6886af,

title = "Reply to Boogert et al.: The devil is unlikely to be in association or distraction",

author = "Taylor, \{Alex H.\} and Rachael Miller and Gray, \{Russell D.\}",

year = "2013",

month = jan,

day = "22",

doi = "10.1073/pnas.1220564110",

language = "English",

volume = "110",

pages = "E274",

journal = "Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America",

issn = "0027-8424",

publisher = "National Academy of Sciences",

number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reply to Boogert et al.

T2 - The devil is unlikely to be in association or distraction

AU - Taylor, Alex H.

AU - Miller, Rachael

AU - Gray, Russell D.

PY - 2013/1/22

Y1 - 2013/1/22

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84872833220

U2 - 10.1073/pnas.1220564110

DO - 10.1073/pnas.1220564110

M3 - Letter

SN - 0027-8424

VL - 110

SP - E274

JO - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

JF - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

IS - 4

ER -