Reply to Comment by Mandel et al. on “Numerically Bounded Linguistic Probability Schemes Are Unlikely to Communicate Uncertainty Effectively”

Andrew D. King; Sarah E. Perkins-Kirkpatrick; Michael F. Wehner; Sophie C. Lewis

doi:10.1029/2020EF001757

Reply to Comment by Mandel et al. on “Numerically Bounded Linguistic Probability Schemes Are Unlikely to Communicate Uncertainty Effectively”

Andrew D. King^*, Sarah E. Perkins-Kirkpatrick, Michael F. Wehner, Sophie C. Lewis

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Letter › peer-review

Abstract

This article is a reply to a comment byMandel et al. (2020), https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2020EF001526.

We thank the Comment's authors for their considered critique of our paper. We respond to their main criticisms and hope that this discussion motivates further consideration of communication strategies for event attribution analyses.

Original language	English
Article number	e2020EF001757
Number of pages	2
Journal	Earth's Future
Volume	9
Issue number	1
Early online date	7 Oct 2020
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1029/2020EF001757
Publication status	Published - Jan 2021
Externally published	Yes

Access to Document

10.1029/2020EF001757

Cite this

@article{211a46c2a60b4534a0073add38c4acb2,

title = "Reply to Comment by Mandel et al. on “Numerically Bounded Linguistic Probability Schemes Are Unlikely to Communicate Uncertainty Effectively”",

abstract = "This article is a reply to a comment byMandel et al. (2020), https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2020EF001526.We thank the Comment's authors for their considered critique of our paper. We respond to their main criticisms and hope that this discussion motivates further consideration of communication strategies for event attribution analyses.",

keywords = "attribution, climate change, communication, extreme events",

author = "King, {Andrew D.} and Perkins-Kirkpatrick, {Sarah E.} and Wehner, {Michael F.} and Lewis, {Sophie C.}",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright}2020. The Authors.",

year = "2021",

month = jan,

doi = "10.1029/2020EF001757",

language = "English",

volume = "9",

journal = "Earth's Future",

issn = "2328-4277",

publisher = "John Wiley & Sons Inc.",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reply to Comment by Mandel et al. on “Numerically Bounded Linguistic Probability Schemes Are Unlikely to Communicate Uncertainty Effectively”

AU - King, Andrew D.

AU - Perkins-Kirkpatrick, Sarah E.

AU - Wehner, Michael F.

AU - Lewis, Sophie C.

PY - 2021/1

Y1 - 2021/1

N2 - This article is a reply to a comment byMandel et al. (2020), https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2020EF001526.We thank the Comment's authors for their considered critique of our paper. We respond to their main criticisms and hope that this discussion motivates further consideration of communication strategies for event attribution analyses.

AB - This article is a reply to a comment byMandel et al. (2020), https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2020EF001526.We thank the Comment's authors for their considered critique of our paper. We respond to their main criticisms and hope that this discussion motivates further consideration of communication strategies for event attribution analyses.

KW - attribution

KW - climate change

KW - communication

KW - extreme events

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85099931104&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1029/2020EF001757

DO - 10.1029/2020EF001757

M3 - Letter

AN - SCOPUS:85099931104

SN - 2328-4277

VL - 9

JO - Earth's Future

JF - Earth's Future

IS - 1

M1 - e2020EF001757

ER -

Reply to Comment by Mandel et al. on “Numerically Bounded Linguistic Probability Schemes Are Unlikely to Communicate Uncertainty Effectively”

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this