Reply to “misclassification of PfEH1 and PfEH2 as epoxide hydrolases”

Daniel E. Goldberg; Natalie J. Spillman

doi:10.1128/mBio.00235-17

Reply to “misclassification of PfEH1 and PfEH2 as epoxide hydrolases”

Daniel E. Goldberg^*, Natalie J. Spillman

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Letter › peer-review

Abstract

-

Original language	English
Article number	e00235-17
Journal	mBio
Volume	8
Issue number	2
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.00235-17
Publication status	Published - 1 Mar 2017

Access to Document

10.1128/mBio.00235-17

Cite this

@article{f227953098794a5bad3b4445e934d7c2,

title = "Reply to “misclassification of PfEH1 and PfEH2 as epoxide hydrolases”",

abstract = "-",

author = "Goldberg, {Daniel E.} and Spillman, {Natalie J.}",

year = "2017",

month = mar,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1128/mBio.00235-17",

language = "English",

volume = "8",

journal = "mBio",

issn = "2161-2129",

publisher = "American Society for Microbiology",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reply to “misclassification of PfEH1 and PfEH2 as epoxide hydrolases”

AU - Goldberg, Daniel E.

AU - Spillman, Natalie J.

PY - 2017/3/1

Y1 - 2017/3/1

N2 - -

AB - -

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85019109479&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1128/mBio.00235-17

DO - 10.1128/mBio.00235-17

M3 - Letter

SN - 2161-2129

VL - 8

JO - mBio

JF - mBio

IS - 2

M1 - e00235-17

ER -

Reply to “misclassification of PfEH1 and PfEH2 as epoxide hydrolases”

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this