Representing doctoral practice in the laboratory sciences

Jim Cumming*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

    8 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    At the same time, an inherent bias in the current literature has been identified. For example, Pearson (2005: 125) has argued that ‘much of the recent scholarship on doctoral education is focused on social sciences, humanities and professional fields’. More recently, a review of the literature conducted in the United Kingdom found that ‘there is little qualitative research evidence available on the doctoral student experience in science’ (Leonard et al., 2006). Another finding was that the majority of studies were not based on any discernible theoretical framework. A study of doctoral practice in the laboratory sciences is thus an important and timely contribution to the literature. The objective of this chapter is to investigate the representation of doctoral practice with a particular focus on pedagogy.

    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationChanging Practices of Doctoral Education
    PublisherTaylor and Francis
    Pages113-125
    Number of pages13
    ISBN (Electronic)9781135265670
    ISBN (Print)9780203870488
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2009

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Representing doctoral practice in the laboratory sciences'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this