Representing Falsehoods

Robert E. Goodin*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Legal representatives are generally not allowed literally to lie to the court, even if their clients so instruct them. Why is there no analogous prohibition on political representatives lying in Congressional proceedings? There is just such a prohibition against witnesses lying in Congressional hearings, after all. Having considered and dismissed several potential rationales for the disparity, I offer positive reasons to think there should be, since truth-telling is functionally important to the legislative process. I discuss some ways such a norm might be enforced within existing Congressional procedures, and I point to precedents in other countries where something similar has already been done.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)495-512
    Number of pages18
    JournalJournal of Social Philosophy
    Volume50
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2019

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Representing Falsehoods'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this