Reputation versus office: Why populist radical right governmental participation has differed between Sweden and Denmark

Duncan McDonnell*, Annika Werner, Malin Karlsson

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    8 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Sweden and Denmark have presented contrasting relationships between centre-right and populist radical right (PRR) parties. In Sweden, the centre-right has refused cooperation with the Sweden Democrats (Sverigedemokraterna) (SD), even when this cost the centre-right office. However, in Denmark, coalitions led by centre-right parties have cooperated with the Danish People’s Party (Dansk Folkeparti) (DF) on multiple occasions. Through a controlled comparison, we examine what explains these different outcomes. Using Chapel Hill Expert Surveys and public opinion data, we firstly look at the policy congruence between parties and the social acceptability of cooperation. We then examine interview material with representatives from centre-right and PRR parties in Sweden and Denmark to see their explanations of cooperation and non-cooperation. We conclude that, while the office goals of Danish centre-right parties, along with the policy focus and uncontroversial past of DF, explain that case, the reputation and past of SD has precluded a similar outcome.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)613-630
    Number of pages18
    JournalInternational Political Science Review
    Volume42
    Issue number5
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Nov 2021

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Reputation versus office: Why populist radical right governmental participation has differed between Sweden and Denmark'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this