Resource wars: The anthropology of mining

Chris Ballard*, Glenn Banks

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    462 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    The scope for an anthropology of mining has been dramatically transformed since the review by Ricardo Godoy, published in this review journal in 1985. The minerals boom of the 1980s led to an aggressive expansion of mine development in greenfield areas, many of them the domains of indigenous communities. Under considerable pressure, the conventional binary contest between states and corporations over the benefits and impacts of mining has been widened to incorporate the representations of local communities, and broad but unstable mining communities now coalesce around individual projects. Focused primarily on projects in developing nations of the Asia-Pacific region, this review questions the often-monolithic characterizations of state, corporate, and community forms of agency and charts the debate among anthropologists involved in mining, variously as consultants, researchers, and advocates, about appropriate terms for their engagement.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)287-313
    Number of pages27
    JournalAnnual Review of Anthropology
    Volume32
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2003

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Resource wars: The anthropology of mining'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this