Responding to registrars' in-consultation calls for assistance: Practical implications from the ReCeNT project

Susan M. Wearne*, Simon Morgan, Parker Magin, Neil Spike, Amanda Tapley, Cathy Regan, Lawrie McArthur

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    2 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Background General practice registrars in Australia are expected to identify and address their knowledge or skills gaps during consultations. The content and frequency of registrars seeking assistance and the factors that influence this have been studied for 84,723 consultations. Term 1 registrars asked their supervisor for help in 11.0% of consultations, but by term 4 this reduced to 1.2% of consultations. Assistance was most often for skin or musculoskeletal conditions, and more often about management than diagnosis. Objective This article discusses the implications of this information for Australian general practice training. Discussion Registrars asked their supervisors for assistance despite having ready access to electronic information. Practices can anticipate supervisor interruptions approximately every tenth registrar consultation. The greater input required by registrars from supervisors earlier in training should be acknowledged by more flexible standards and payments to practices. A priority for general practice supervisor professional development is how to teach the management of complex patients, dermatology and musculoskeletal medicine.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)446-449
    Number of pages4
    JournalAustralian Family Physician
    Volume45
    Issue number6
    Publication statusPublished - 2016

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Responding to registrars' in-consultation calls for assistance: Practical implications from the ReCeNT project'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this