TY - JOUR
T1 - Response Strategies and Learning in Discrete Choice Experiments
AU - Scheufele, Gabriela
AU - Bennett, Jeff
PY - 2012/7
Y1 - 2012/7
N2 - This study explores ordering effects and response strategies in repeated binary discrete choice experiments. Mechanism design theory and empirical evidence suggest that repeated choice tasks per respondent induce strategic behaviour. We find evidence that strategic opportunities provided by the order in which choice sets are presented to respondents affect choice decisions (strategic response). The results suggest, however, that respondents may solely respond to high cost rather than low cost inconsistencies. That is, respondents are more cost sensitive, and thus have a lower willingness to pay (WTP), if the same or a similar level of provision was offered in a previous choice set at a lower cost than if it was not. Yet, the cost sensitivity, and thus WTP, remains unaffected if the same or a similar level of provision was offered in a previous choice set at a higher cost. Our findings further indicate that cost sensitivity increases (and thus WTP decreases), when respondents progress through the choice task, with this increase (decrease) lessening as more choice questions are answered. Possible explanations are value learning and strategic learning.
AB - This study explores ordering effects and response strategies in repeated binary discrete choice experiments. Mechanism design theory and empirical evidence suggest that repeated choice tasks per respondent induce strategic behaviour. We find evidence that strategic opportunities provided by the order in which choice sets are presented to respondents affect choice decisions (strategic response). The results suggest, however, that respondents may solely respond to high cost rather than low cost inconsistencies. That is, respondents are more cost sensitive, and thus have a lower willingness to pay (WTP), if the same or a similar level of provision was offered in a previous choice set at a lower cost than if it was not. Yet, the cost sensitivity, and thus WTP, remains unaffected if the same or a similar level of provision was offered in a previous choice set at a higher cost. Our findings further indicate that cost sensitivity increases (and thus WTP decreases), when respondents progress through the choice task, with this increase (decrease) lessening as more choice questions are answered. Possible explanations are value learning and strategic learning.
KW - Discrete choice experiments
KW - Incentive compatibility
KW - Ordering effects
KW - Random parameter multinominal logit models
KW - Repeated binary choice task
KW - Response strategies
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84862868973&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10640-011-9537-z
DO - 10.1007/s10640-011-9537-z
M3 - Article
SN - 0924-6460
VL - 52
SP - 435
EP - 453
JO - Environmental and Resource Economics
JF - Environmental and Resource Economics
IS - 3
ER -