Response to goldstein

Brian Garrett

doi:10.1093/analys/ans104

Response to goldstein

Brian Garrett^*

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

In 'The Sorites is disguised nonsense' Analysis (2012) 77: 61-5 L Goldstein attempts to show that some of the conditionals in any Sorites argument are nonsensical, and hence no Sorites argument can be sound. I give four reasons why this is not the case.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	742-744
Number of pages	3
Journal	Analysis
Volume	72
Issue number	4
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/ans104
Publication status	Published - Oct 2012

Access to Document

10.1093/analys/ans104

Cite this

@article{a6a32e35e3e94dfb824a02b6bcdb7c7a,

title = "Response to goldstein",

abstract = "In 'The Sorites is disguised nonsense' Analysis (2012) 77: 61-5 L Goldstein attempts to show that some of the conditionals in any Sorites argument are nonsensical, and hence no Sorites argument can be sound. I give four reasons why this is not the case.",

author = "Brian Garrett",

year = "2012",

month = oct,

doi = "10.1093/analys/ans104",

language = "English",

volume = "72",

pages = "742--744",

journal = "Analysis",

issn = "0003-2638",

publisher = "Oxford University Press",

number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Response to goldstein

AU - Garrett, Brian

PY - 2012/10

Y1 - 2012/10

N2 - In 'The Sorites is disguised nonsense' Analysis (2012) 77: 61-5 L Goldstein attempts to show that some of the conditionals in any Sorites argument are nonsensical, and hence no Sorites argument can be sound. I give four reasons why this is not the case.

AB - In 'The Sorites is disguised nonsense' Analysis (2012) 77: 61-5 L Goldstein attempts to show that some of the conditionals in any Sorites argument are nonsensical, and hence no Sorites argument can be sound. I give four reasons why this is not the case.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84867413438&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/analys/ans104

DO - 10.1093/analys/ans104

M3 - Article

SN - 0003-2638

VL - 72

SP - 742

EP - 744

JO - Analysis

JF - Analysis

IS - 4

ER -

Response to goldstein

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this