Responsibility for structural injustice: A third thought

Robert E. Goodin*, Christian Barry

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    13 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Some of the most invidious injustices are seemingly the results of impersonal workings of rigged social structures. Who bears responsibility for the injustices perpetrated through them? Iris Marion Young – the pre-eminent theorist of responsibility for structural injustice – argues that we should be responsible mostly in forward-looking ways for remedying structural injustice, rather than liable in a backward-looking way for creating it. In so doing she distinguishes between individualized responsibility for past structural injustice and collective responsibility for preventing future structural injustice. We reject both those arguments but embrace and extend Young’s third line of analysis, which was much less fully developed in her work. We agree that people should take a stand against structural injustice, even if it is likely to prove futile. That is in fact a position that is widely endorsed in social practice.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)339-356
    Number of pages18
    JournalPolitics, Philosophy and Economics
    Volume20
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Nov 2021

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Responsibility for structural injustice: A third thought'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this