Restricted modes: Social media, content classification and LGBTQ sexual citizenship

Clare Southerton*, Daniel Marshall, Peter Aggleton, Mary Lou Rasmussen, Rob Cover

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    32 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    In the context of recent controversies surrounding the censorship of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and queer online content, specifically on YouTube and Tumblr, we interrogate the relationship between normative understandings of sexual citizenship and the content classification regimes. We argue that these content classification systems and the platforms’ responses to public criticism both operate as norm-producing technologies, in which the complexities of sexuality and desire are obscured in order to cultivate notions of a ‘good’ lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender or queer sexual citizen. However, despite normative work of classification seeking to distinguish between sexuality and sex, we argue that the high-profile failures of these classification systems create the conditions for users to draw attention to, rather than firm, these messy boundaries.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)920-938
    Number of pages19
    JournalNew Media and Society
    Volume23
    Issue number5
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - May 2021

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Restricted modes: Social media, content classification and LGBTQ sexual citizenship'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this