TY - JOUR
T1 - Results of the second Ice Shelf–Ocean Model Intercomparison Project (ISOMIP+)
AU - Yung, Claire K.
AU - Asay-Davis, Xylar S.
AU - Adcroft, Alistair
AU - Bull, Christopher Y.S.
AU - De Rydt, Jan
AU - Dinniman, Michael S.
AU - Galton-Fenzi, Benjamin K.
AU - Goldberg, Daniel
AU - Gwyther, David E.
AU - Hallberg, Robert
AU - Harrison, Matthew
AU - Hattermann, Tore
AU - Holland, David M.
AU - Holland, Denise
AU - Holland, Paul R.
AU - Jordan, James R.
AU - Jourdain, Nicolas C.
AU - Kusahara, Kazuya
AU - Marques, Gustavo
AU - Mathiot, Pierre
AU - Menemenlis, Dimitris
AU - Morrison, Adele K.
AU - Nakayama, Yoshihiro
AU - Sergienko, Olga
AU - Smith, Robin S.
AU - Stern, Alon
AU - Timmermann, Ralph
AU - Zhou, Qin
N1 - ©2026 The authors
PY - 2026/4/13
Y1 - 2026/4/13
N2 - Ocean-driven basal melting of Antarctic ice shelves plays an important role in the mass loss of the Antarctic Ice Sheet. Ice shelf cavity-resolving ocean models are a valuable tool for understanding ice shelf-ocean interactions and for simulating projections of ice shelf and ocean states under future climate. Designed to assess the current state of ice shelf–ocean modelling, the second Ice Shelf–Ocean Model Intercomparison Project, ISOMIP+, consists of 12 ocean model configurations submitted with a common, idealised experimental setup. Here, we focus on the experiments Ocean0–2, which are ocean models with idealised, static ice shelf geometries, but where the ocean reaches a balance with prescribed far-field ocean conditions. Different thermal transfer coefficient values (ranging from 0.011 to 0.2) are used for each model in the melting parameterisation to achieve a common, tuned melt rate since the models cover a range of types of vertical coordinates, ice–ocean boundary layer treatments, and numerical schemes. These model differences lead to spread in the resultant ocean properties, circulation, boundary-layer structure and spatial distribution of melting. We also highlight similarities between models, such as a shared linear relationship across most models between melt rate and overturning and barotropic streamfunctions during the spin-up and spin-down, demonstrating a robust relationship between melt and circulation across models and forcing conditions. The ISOMIP+ results provide a systematic comparison of ice shelf cavity-capable ocean models. However, we also demonstrate the need for realistic ice shelf–ocean model intercomparison projects (some already underway) to assess model biases and inter-model variation against sparse observations. Further research is needed to understand the differences between models and further improve our modelled representations of the ice–ocean boundary layer and ice shelf cavity circulation.
AB - Ocean-driven basal melting of Antarctic ice shelves plays an important role in the mass loss of the Antarctic Ice Sheet. Ice shelf cavity-resolving ocean models are a valuable tool for understanding ice shelf-ocean interactions and for simulating projections of ice shelf and ocean states under future climate. Designed to assess the current state of ice shelf–ocean modelling, the second Ice Shelf–Ocean Model Intercomparison Project, ISOMIP+, consists of 12 ocean model configurations submitted with a common, idealised experimental setup. Here, we focus on the experiments Ocean0–2, which are ocean models with idealised, static ice shelf geometries, but where the ocean reaches a balance with prescribed far-field ocean conditions. Different thermal transfer coefficient values (ranging from 0.011 to 0.2) are used for each model in the melting parameterisation to achieve a common, tuned melt rate since the models cover a range of types of vertical coordinates, ice–ocean boundary layer treatments, and numerical schemes. These model differences lead to spread in the resultant ocean properties, circulation, boundary-layer structure and spatial distribution of melting. We also highlight similarities between models, such as a shared linear relationship across most models between melt rate and overturning and barotropic streamfunctions during the spin-up and spin-down, demonstrating a robust relationship between melt and circulation across models and forcing conditions. The ISOMIP+ results provide a systematic comparison of ice shelf cavity-capable ocean models. However, we also demonstrate the need for realistic ice shelf–ocean model intercomparison projects (some already underway) to assess model biases and inter-model variation against sparse observations. Further research is needed to understand the differences between models and further improve our modelled representations of the ice–ocean boundary layer and ice shelf cavity circulation.
KW - Accurate
KW - Basal melt
KW - Finite-volume
KW - Grounding-line migration
KW - Parameterization
KW - Pine island
KW - Sea
KW - Sheet model
KW - Southern-ocean
KW - Thermohaline circulation
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105036239419
U2 - 10.5194/tc-20-2053-2026
DO - 10.5194/tc-20-2053-2026
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105036239419
SN - 1994-0416
VL - 20
SP - 2053
EP - 2088
JO - Cryosphere
JF - Cryosphere
IS - 4
ER -