Retrenchment as a Screening Mechanism: Power Shifts, Strategic Withdrawal, and Credible Signals

Brandon K. Yoder*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Both advocates and opponents of retrenchment have treated it as an undesirable, last-ditch strategy for states that have already experienced severe decline. This article presents a formal model that identifies an unrecognized benefit of retrenchment: It can provide declining states with valuable information about rising states' future intentions. By removing constraints over the behavior of rising states in a particular region, a declining state can induce hostile risers to attempt revision of the regional order. This, in turn, makes a riser's cooperative behavior more credible as a signal of benign intentions, allowing the decliner to oppose hostile types while accommodating benign ones. In contrast to the existing focus on retrenchment as a desperate strategy taken from a position of weakness, this article suggests that the informational benefits of retrenchment are greatest when it is undertaken early, from a position of strength.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)130-145
Number of pages16
JournalAmerican Journal of Political Science
Volume63
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2019
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Retrenchment as a Screening Mechanism: Power Shifts, Strategic Withdrawal, and Credible Signals'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this