Review Essay: Why (Re) Write Judgements?

Heather Roberts, Laura Sweeney

    Research output: Contribution to journalLiterature review

    Abstract

    Australian Feminist Judgments is a collection of fictional judgments for real Australian cases that have been rewritten by Australian scholars from the perspective of a feminist judge. Each judgment is introduced by a commentary, written by a different scholar, explaining the legal and historical context of the original decision and the choices made by the feminist judge. This review essay locates the collection within more general debates surrounding judgment writing, particularly leading Australian extra-judicial commentary on how and why judgments are written. Against this larger plane, we consider a number of the key issues raised by the collection about judgment writing, including the significance of recounting the facts of a case, the uses of formalist judicial method and the capacity of judgments to effect change. Drawing on a number of examples from the collection, this review essay contends that Australian Feminist Judgments makes a valuable contribution not only to contemporary feminist debates, but also to issues going to the heart of judicial practices and judgment.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)457-466
    JournalSydney Law Review
    Volume37
    Publication statusPublished - 2015

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Review Essay: Why (Re) Write Judgements?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this