Reviewing high-risk and high-consequence decisions: Finding a safer way

Michael Eburn, Steve Dovers

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    4 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    This paper critiques the adversarial processes used in inquiries following significant natural hazard events, in particular bushfires. Shortcomings identified with current practices suggest postevent inquiries should adopt restorative practices rather than traditional adversarial procedures. Restorative justice is a concept established in the area of criminal law. It is argued that the use of restorative practices could assist in formulating inquiries that would assist all parties to collectively resolve how to deal with a aftermath of the disaster and deal with its implications for the future. Restorative practices would enable a focus on both short- and long-term recovery.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)26-29
    Number of pages4
    JournalAustralian Journal of Emergency Management
    Volume32
    Issue number4
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2017

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Reviewing high-risk and high-consequence decisions: Finding a safer way'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this