Abstract
This paper critiques the adversarial processes used in inquiries following significant natural hazard events, in particular bushfires. Shortcomings identified with current practices suggest postevent inquiries should adopt restorative practices rather than traditional adversarial procedures. Restorative justice is a concept established in the area of criminal law. It is argued that the use of restorative practices could assist in formulating inquiries that would assist all parties to collectively resolve how to deal with a aftermath of the disaster and deal with its implications for the future. Restorative practices would enable a focus on both short- and long-term recovery.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 26-29 |
Number of pages | 4 |
Journal | Australian Journal of Emergency Management |
Volume | 32 |
Issue number | 4 |
Publication status | Published - 1 Oct 2017 |