Revisiting moral panics in sexuality education

Mary Lou Rasmussen*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

There is a common impulse within academic research on sexuality education to draw on the notion of moral panic in order to better understand 'unreasonable' and emotional opposition to the implementation of sexuality education programs. The aim of this article is to interrogate this tendency to classify religious opposition to the sexuality education curriculum as suggestive of a 'moral panic'. I begin with a brief discussion of how the notion of 'moral panic' is commonly used in academic and popular discourse, and proceed to a discussion of 'moral panic' in the field of sexuality education, specifically focusing on the work of US researcher Janice Irvine. I also consider some research on recent South Australian controversies related to sexuality education in schools. Finally, I consider the attribution of 'moral panic' in accounting for religious opposition to sexuality education as a secular formation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)118-130
Number of pages13
JournalMedia International Australia
Issue number135
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Revisiting moral panics in sexuality education'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this