TY - JOUR
T1 - Revisiting the effects of rTMS over the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex on pain
T2 - An updated systematic review and meta-analysis
AU - Zhou, Jie
AU - Wang, Ying
AU - Luo, Xi
AU - Fitzgerald, Paul B.
AU - Cash, Robin F.H.
AU - Fitzgibbon, Bernadette M.
AU - Che, Xianwei
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Authors
PY - 2024/7/1
Y1 - 2024/7/1
N2 - Background: Our previous study synthesized the analgesic effects of repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) over the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) trials up to 2019. There has been a significant increase in pain trials in the past few years, along with methodological variabilities such as sample size, stimulation intensity, and rTMS paradigms. Objectives/Methods: This study therefore updated the effects of DLPFC-rTMS on chronic pain and quantified the impact of methodological differences across studies. Results: A total of 36 studies were included. Among them, 26 studies were clinical trials (update = 9, 307/711 patients), and 10 (update = 1, 34/249 participants) were provoked pain studies. The updated meta-analysis does not support an effect on neuropathic pain after including the additional trials (pshort-term = 0.20, pmid-term = 0.50). However, there is medium-to-large analgesic effect in migraine trials extending up to six weeks follow-up (SMDmid-term = −0.80, SMDlong-term = −0.51), that was not previously reported. Methodological differences wthine the studies were considered. DLPFC-rTMS also induces potential improvement in the emotional aspects of pain (SMDshort-term = −0.28). Conclusions: The updated systematic meta-analysis continues to support analgesic effects for chronic pain overall. However, the updated results no longer support DLPFC-rTMS for pain relief in neuropathic pain, and do supports DLPFC-rTMS in the management of migraine. There is also evidence for DLPFC-rTMS to improve emotional aspects of pain.
AB - Background: Our previous study synthesized the analgesic effects of repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) over the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) trials up to 2019. There has been a significant increase in pain trials in the past few years, along with methodological variabilities such as sample size, stimulation intensity, and rTMS paradigms. Objectives/Methods: This study therefore updated the effects of DLPFC-rTMS on chronic pain and quantified the impact of methodological differences across studies. Results: A total of 36 studies were included. Among them, 26 studies were clinical trials (update = 9, 307/711 patients), and 10 (update = 1, 34/249 participants) were provoked pain studies. The updated meta-analysis does not support an effect on neuropathic pain after including the additional trials (pshort-term = 0.20, pmid-term = 0.50). However, there is medium-to-large analgesic effect in migraine trials extending up to six weeks follow-up (SMDmid-term = −0.80, SMDlong-term = −0.51), that was not previously reported. Methodological differences wthine the studies were considered. DLPFC-rTMS also induces potential improvement in the emotional aspects of pain (SMDshort-term = −0.28). Conclusions: The updated systematic meta-analysis continues to support analgesic effects for chronic pain overall. However, the updated results no longer support DLPFC-rTMS for pain relief in neuropathic pain, and do supports DLPFC-rTMS in the management of migraine. There is also evidence for DLPFC-rTMS to improve emotional aspects of pain.
KW - Analgesia
KW - DLPFC
KW - Meta-analysis
KW - rTMS
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85200206883&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.brs.2024.07.011
DO - 10.1016/j.brs.2024.07.011
M3 - Review article
C2 - 39089648
AN - SCOPUS:85200206883
SN - 1935-861X
VL - 17
SP - 928
EP - 937
JO - Brain Stimulation
JF - Brain Stimulation
IS - 4
ER -