Revolutions without enemies: Key transformations in political science

John S. Dryzek*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    48 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    American political science is a congenitally unsettled discipline, witnessing a number of movements designed to reorient its fundamental character. Four prominent movements are compared here: the statism accompanying the discipline's early professionalization, the pluralism of the late 1910s and early 1920s, behavioralism, and the Caucus for a New Political Science (with a brief glance at the more recent Perestroika). Of these movements, only the first and third clearly succeeded. The discipline has proven very hard to shift. Despite the rhetoric that accompanied behavioralism, both it and statism were revolutions without enemies within the discipline (other than those appearing after they succeeded), and therein lies the key to their success.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)487-492
    Number of pages6
    JournalAmerican Political Science Review
    Volume100
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Nov 2006

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Revolutions without enemies: Key transformations in political science'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this