TY - GEN
T1 - Rigidity and persistence of directed graphs
AU - Hendrickx, Julien M.
AU - Anderson, Brian D.O.
AU - Blondel, Vincent D.
PY - 2005
Y1 - 2005
N2 - Motivated by [1], [2] and [3], we consider here formations of autonomous agents in a 2-dimensional space. Each agent tries to maintain its distances toward a pre-specified group of other agents constant, and the problem is to determine if one can guarantee that the structure of the formation will persist, i.e., if the distance between any pair of agents will remain constant. A natural way to represent such a formation is to use a directed graph. We provide a theoretical framework for this problem, and give a formal definition of persistent graphs (a graph is persistent if almost all corresponding agents formations persist). Note that although persistence is related to rigidity (concerning which much is known [4]), these are two distinct notions. We then derive various properties of persistent graphs, and give a combinatorial criterion to decide persistence. We also define the notion of minimal persistence (persistence with least number of edges), and eventually, we apply these notion to the interesting special case of cycle-free graphs.
AB - Motivated by [1], [2] and [3], we consider here formations of autonomous agents in a 2-dimensional space. Each agent tries to maintain its distances toward a pre-specified group of other agents constant, and the problem is to determine if one can guarantee that the structure of the formation will persist, i.e., if the distance between any pair of agents will remain constant. A natural way to represent such a formation is to use a directed graph. We provide a theoretical framework for this problem, and give a formal definition of persistent graphs (a graph is persistent if almost all corresponding agents formations persist). Note that although persistence is related to rigidity (concerning which much is known [4]), these are two distinct notions. We then derive various properties of persistent graphs, and give a combinatorial criterion to decide persistence. We also define the notion of minimal persistence (persistence with least number of edges), and eventually, we apply these notion to the interesting special case of cycle-free graphs.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33847192140&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/CDC.2005.1582484
DO - 10.1109/CDC.2005.1582484
M3 - Conference contribution
SN - 0780395689
SN - 9780780395688
T3 - Proceedings of the 44th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, and the European Control Conference, CDC-ECC '05
SP - 2176
EP - 2181
BT - Proceedings of the 44th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, and the European Control Conference, CDC-ECC '05
T2 - 44th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, and the European Control Conference, CDC-ECC '05
Y2 - 12 December 2005 through 15 December 2005
ER -