TY - JOUR
T1 - Risk estimation for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease
T2 - considerations for appropriate risk prediction model selection
AU - van Daalen, Kim Robin
AU - Zhang, Dudan
AU - Kaptoge, Stephen
AU - Paige, Ellie
AU - Di Angelantonio, Emanuele
AU - Pennells, Lisa
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license
PY - 2024/8
Y1 - 2024/8
N2 - Cardiovascular diseases remain the number one cause of death globally. Cardiovascular disease risk scores are an integral tool in primary prevention, being used to identify individuals at the highest risk and guide the assignment of preventive interventions. Available risk scores differ substantially in terms of the population sample data sources used for their derivation and, consequently, in the absolute risks they assign to individuals. Differences in cardiovascular disease epidemiology between the populations contributing to the development of risk scores, and the target populations in which they are applied, can result in overestimation or underestimation of cardiovascular disease risks for individuals, and poorly informed clinical decisions. Given the wide plethora of cardiovascular disease risk scores available, identification of an appropriate risk score for a target population can be challenging. This Review provides an up-to-date overview of guideline-recommended cardiovascular disease risk scores from global, regional, and national contexts, evaluates their comparative characteristics and qualities, and provides guidance on selection of an appropriate risk score.
AB - Cardiovascular diseases remain the number one cause of death globally. Cardiovascular disease risk scores are an integral tool in primary prevention, being used to identify individuals at the highest risk and guide the assignment of preventive interventions. Available risk scores differ substantially in terms of the population sample data sources used for their derivation and, consequently, in the absolute risks they assign to individuals. Differences in cardiovascular disease epidemiology between the populations contributing to the development of risk scores, and the target populations in which they are applied, can result in overestimation or underestimation of cardiovascular disease risks for individuals, and poorly informed clinical decisions. Given the wide plethora of cardiovascular disease risk scores available, identification of an appropriate risk score for a target population can be challenging. This Review provides an up-to-date overview of guideline-recommended cardiovascular disease risk scores from global, regional, and national contexts, evaluates their comparative characteristics and qualities, and provides guidance on selection of an appropriate risk score.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85198752117&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S2214-109X(24)00210-9
DO - 10.1016/S2214-109X(24)00210-9
M3 - Review article
C2 - 39030064
AN - SCOPUS:85198752117
SN - 2214-109X
VL - 12
SP - e1343-e1358
JO - The Lancet Global Health
JF - The Lancet Global Health
IS - 8
ER -