TY - JOUR
T1 - Risk governance in the water sensitive city
T2 - Practitioner perspectives on ownership, management and trust
AU - Dobbie, Meredith Frances
AU - Brown, Rebekah Ruth
AU - Farrelly, Megan Anne
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 Elsevier Ltd.
PY - 2016/1
Y1 - 2016/1
N2 - In the water sensitive city, a hybrid mix of centralised and decentralised water systems and sources will operate at a range of scales to provide sustainable fit-for-purpose water services that will safeguard environmental quality, intergenerational equity and landscape amenity. Governance of these systems is likely to differ from the traditional arrangement, involving multiple stakeholders who must work together to manage risk. Trust will be essential to effective governance. This study explored attitudes of Australian urban water practitioners towards ownership and management of different water systems that might comprise the water sensitive city, including who they would trust to manage the associated risk. Results support the status quo, in which risk management responsibilities lie with state and local government or corporatised water utilities. Although practitioners support ownership and management of lot-scale water systems by homeowners, they trust them only to manage the risks associated with rainwater tanks. These results can be interpreted as risk perceptions, which are influenced by trust and knowledge. Implementation of decentralised water systems should be accompanied by governance arrangements that include strategies to enhance trust between stakeholders and to facilitate the co-production of knowledge to inform shared decision-making.
AB - In the water sensitive city, a hybrid mix of centralised and decentralised water systems and sources will operate at a range of scales to provide sustainable fit-for-purpose water services that will safeguard environmental quality, intergenerational equity and landscape amenity. Governance of these systems is likely to differ from the traditional arrangement, involving multiple stakeholders who must work together to manage risk. Trust will be essential to effective governance. This study explored attitudes of Australian urban water practitioners towards ownership and management of different water systems that might comprise the water sensitive city, including who they would trust to manage the associated risk. Results support the status quo, in which risk management responsibilities lie with state and local government or corporatised water utilities. Although practitioners support ownership and management of lot-scale water systems by homeowners, they trust them only to manage the risks associated with rainwater tanks. These results can be interpreted as risk perceptions, which are influenced by trust and knowledge. Implementation of decentralised water systems should be accompanied by governance arrangements that include strategies to enhance trust between stakeholders and to facilitate the co-production of knowledge to inform shared decision-making.
KW - Inclusive risk governance
KW - Practitioners
KW - Risk perception
KW - Trust
KW - Water sensitive city
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84945548449&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.envsci.2015.10.008
DO - 10.1016/j.envsci.2015.10.008
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84945548449
SN - 1462-9011
VL - 55
SP - 218
EP - 227
JO - Environmental Science and Policy
JF - Environmental Science and Policy
IS - 1
ER -