Risky business? The energy charter treaty, renewable energy, and investor-state disputes

Kyla Tienhaara, Christian Downie

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    25 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Global energy governance has received increased attention from scholars and policymakers in recent years. Much of the discussion has focused on the inadequacy of the current institutional architecture, particularly in light of the urgent need to decarbonize energy systems. However, little attention has been given to the capacity of global institutions to promote investment in renewable energy. This article considers claims by proponents of the Energy Charter Treaty, the most developed trade and investment treaty in the global energy architecture, that it can play an important role in this regard. Specifically, it examines the ECT’s investor-state dispute settlement mechanism. Drawing on scholarship in global governance, law, and economics and an analysis of recent investor-state disputes, the article argues that there are problems with the assumptions underlying the claims of the ECT’s proponents. Critically, there is still a lack of evidence that the ECT has a positive impact on flows of investment in any sector, including the renewable energy sector. There is also a risk that ISDS could be used by the fossil fuel industry to impede a clean energy transition. States should approach accession to the ECT with caution and consider other mechanisms to reduce risk for renewable energy investors.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)451-471
    Number of pages21
    JournalGlobal Governance
    Volume24
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2018

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Risky business? The energy charter treaty, renewable energy, and investor-state disputes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this