Ross River virus disease in tropical Queensland: Evolution of rheumatic manifestations in an inception cohort followed for six months

David Harley*, David Bossingham, David M. Purdie, Nirmala Pandeya, Adrian C. Sleigh

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

70 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To describe the natural history of rheumatic manifestations of Ross River virus (RRV) disease. Design: Prospective longitudinal clinical review. Setting: North Queensland local government areas of Cairns, Douglas, Mareeba and Atherton during January to May 1998. Participants: General practice patients diagnosed with RRV disease on the basis of symptoms and a positive RRV IgM result. Main outcome measures: Rheumatic symptoms and signs assessed as soon as possible after disease onset and on two subsequent occasions (up to 6.5 months after onset). Results: 57 patients were recruited, 47 of whom were reviewed three times (at means of 1.1, 2.4 and 3.6 months after disease onset). Results are reported for these 47: 46 (98%) complained of joint pain at first review, with the ankles, wrists, fingers, knees and metacarpophalangeal joints (II-IV) most commonly involved. Prevalence of joint pain decreased progressively on second and third reviews, both overall (92% and 68% of patients, respectively), and in the five joints most commonly affected. The prevalence of other common rheumatic symptoms and signs, and use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, also progressively declined over the three reviews. Conclusions: Earlier studies may have overestimated the prevalence and duration of symptoms in RRV disease. Progressive resolution over 3-6 months appears usual.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)352-355
Number of pages4
JournalMedical Journal of Australia
Volume177
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 7 Oct 2002
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Ross River virus disease in tropical Queensland: Evolution of rheumatic manifestations in an inception cohort followed for six months'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this