Rural clinical school students do come back: But it may take time

Malcolm Moore*, Sarath Burgis-Kasthala, Amanda Barnard, Sally Hall, Stuart Marks

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    16 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Background and objectives Rural clinical schools (RCSs) help address Australia's rural workforce shortfall, but they require an investment by rural clinicians and communities. Our objective was to determine the location of RCS graduates as one measure of the effectiveness of RCSs. Method This cross-sectional study obtained work location data for Australian National University Medical School (ANUMS) graduates and analysed both RCS and non-RCS data. Results The percentage of graduates working in rural areas after their fifth postgraduate year (PGY6-11: 34.7%) was significantly greater than that of graduates in PGY1-5 (15.2%, P <0.001). Discussion Many graduates who trained in rural sites spend time in cities before returning to work in rural areas. This is encouraging for rural clinicians and communities, but it can take time for graduates to return.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)812-814
    Number of pages3
    JournalAustralian Journal of General Practice
    Volume47
    Issue number11
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2018

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Rural clinical school students do come back: But it may take time'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this