Abstract
A recent proposal that the genus Rymovirus be assimilated into the genus Potyvirus is examined, discussed, and rejected. It illustrates the danger of using ‘sequence identity’ as a proxy for phylogenetic relatedness to distinguish closely related but distinct groups of viruses.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 815-817 |
Number of pages | 3 |
Journal | Archives of Virology |
Volume | 163 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Mar 2018 |