TY - JOUR
T1 - Satellite remote sensing of ecosystem functions
T2 - opportunities, challenges and way forward
AU - Pettorelli, Nathalie
AU - Schulte to Bühne, Henrike
AU - Tulloch, Ayesha
AU - Dubois, Grégoire
AU - Macinnis-Ng, Cate
AU - Queirós, Ana M.
AU - Keith, David A.
AU - Wegmann, Martin
AU - Schrodt, Franziska
AU - Stellmes, Marion
AU - Sonnenschein, Ruth
AU - Geller, Gary N.
AU - Roy, Shovonlal
AU - Somers, Ben
AU - Murray, Nicholas
AU - Bland, Lucie
AU - Geijzendorffer, Ilse
AU - Kerr, Jeremy T.
AU - Broszeit, Stefanie
AU - Leitão, Pedro J.
AU - Duncan, Clare
AU - El Serafy, Ghada
AU - He, Kate S.
AU - Blanchard, Julia L.
AU - Lucas, Richard
AU - Mairota, Paola
AU - Webb, Thomas J.
AU - Nicholson, Emily
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 The Authors. Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Zoological Society of London.
PY - 2018/6
Y1 - 2018/6
N2 - Societal, economic and scientific interests in knowing where biodiversity is, how it is faring and what can be done to efficiently mitigate further biodiversity loss and the associated loss of ecosystem services are at an all-time high. So far, however, biodiversity monitoring has primarily focused on structural and compositional features of ecosystems despite growing evidence that ecosystem functions are key to elucidating the mechanisms through which biological diversity generates services to humanity. This monitoring gap can be traced to the current lack of consensus on what exactly ecosystem functions are and how to track them at scales beyond the site level. This contribution aims to advance the development of a global biodiversity monitoring strategy by proposing the adoption of a set of definitions and a typology for ecosystem functions, and reviewing current opportunities and potential limitations for satellite remote sensing technology to support the monitoring of ecosystem functions worldwide. By clearly defining ecosystem processes, functions and services and their interrelationships, we provide a framework to improve communication between ecologists, land and marine managers, remote sensing specialists and policy makers, thereby addressing a major barrier in the field.
AB - Societal, economic and scientific interests in knowing where biodiversity is, how it is faring and what can be done to efficiently mitigate further biodiversity loss and the associated loss of ecosystem services are at an all-time high. So far, however, biodiversity monitoring has primarily focused on structural and compositional features of ecosystems despite growing evidence that ecosystem functions are key to elucidating the mechanisms through which biological diversity generates services to humanity. This monitoring gap can be traced to the current lack of consensus on what exactly ecosystem functions are and how to track them at scales beyond the site level. This contribution aims to advance the development of a global biodiversity monitoring strategy by proposing the adoption of a set of definitions and a typology for ecosystem functions, and reviewing current opportunities and potential limitations for satellite remote sensing technology to support the monitoring of ecosystem functions worldwide. By clearly defining ecosystem processes, functions and services and their interrelationships, we provide a framework to improve communication between ecologists, land and marine managers, remote sensing specialists and policy makers, thereby addressing a major barrier in the field.
KW - Biodiversity loss
KW - biodiversity monitoring
KW - ecosystem functions
KW - ecosystem services
KW - satellite remote sensing
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85045248766&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/rse2.59
DO - 10.1002/rse2.59
M3 - Article
SN - 2056-3485
VL - 4
SP - 71
EP - 93
JO - Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation
JF - Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation
IS - 2
ER -