Abstract
This article argues that a new diagram is emerging in the criminal justice system as it encounters developments in the neurosciences. This does not take the form that concerns many 'neuroethicists' - it does not entail a challenge to doctrines of free will and the notion of the autonomous legal subject - but is developing around the themes of susceptibility, risk, pre-emption and precaution. I term this diagram 'screen and intervene' and in this article I attempt to trace out this new configuration and consider some of the consequences.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 79-105 |
| Number of pages | 27 |
| Journal | History of the Human Sciences |
| Volume | 23 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Feb 2010 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of ''Screen and intervene': Governing risky brains'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver