TY - JOUR
T1 - Screening for Chlamydia trachomatis at the time of routine Pap smear in general practice
T2 - A cluster randomised controlled trial
AU - Bowden, Francis J.
AU - Currie, Marian J.
AU - Toyne, Helen
AU - McGuiness, Clare
AU - Lim, Lynette L.
AU - Butler, James R.
AU - Glasgow, Nicholas J.
PY - 2008/1/21
Y1 - 2008/1/21
N2 - Objective: To determine whether asking general practitioners to offer chlamydia screening at the same time as Pap screening increases chlamydia screening rates. Design: A pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial. Participants and setting: Doctors from 31 general practices in the Australian Capital Territory performing more than 15 Pap smear screens per year, and all women aged 16-39 years attending those practitioners between 1 November 2004 and 31 October 2005. Intervention: Doctors in the intervention practices were asked to routinely offer combined chlamydia and Pap screening to eligible women; doctors in the control practices were asked to implement screening guidelines based on a risk assessment of the individual patient (ie, usual practice). Main outcome measure: Chlamydia screening rate per visit. Results: There were 26 876 visits by eligible women during the study period: 16 082 to intervention practices and 10 794 to control practices. Chlamydia screening occurred during 6.9% (95% CI, 6.5%-7.3%) of visits to intervention practices and 4.5% (95% CI, 4.1%-4.9%) of visits to control practices. After controlling for clustering and potential confounders, there were twofold greater odds of chlamydia screening occurring during a visit by an eligible woman to an intervention practice than to a control practice (adjusted odds ratio, 2.1 [95% CI, 1.3-3.4]). Conclusion: Combining chlamydia and Pap screening increases the rate of chlamydia screening in general practice. Implementing this approach would require little additional infrastructure support in settings where a cervical screening program already exists.
AB - Objective: To determine whether asking general practitioners to offer chlamydia screening at the same time as Pap screening increases chlamydia screening rates. Design: A pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial. Participants and setting: Doctors from 31 general practices in the Australian Capital Territory performing more than 15 Pap smear screens per year, and all women aged 16-39 years attending those practitioners between 1 November 2004 and 31 October 2005. Intervention: Doctors in the intervention practices were asked to routinely offer combined chlamydia and Pap screening to eligible women; doctors in the control practices were asked to implement screening guidelines based on a risk assessment of the individual patient (ie, usual practice). Main outcome measure: Chlamydia screening rate per visit. Results: There were 26 876 visits by eligible women during the study period: 16 082 to intervention practices and 10 794 to control practices. Chlamydia screening occurred during 6.9% (95% CI, 6.5%-7.3%) of visits to intervention practices and 4.5% (95% CI, 4.1%-4.9%) of visits to control practices. After controlling for clustering and potential confounders, there were twofold greater odds of chlamydia screening occurring during a visit by an eligible woman to an intervention practice than to a control practice (adjusted odds ratio, 2.1 [95% CI, 1.3-3.4]). Conclusion: Combining chlamydia and Pap screening increases the rate of chlamydia screening in general practice. Implementing this approach would require little additional infrastructure support in settings where a cervical screening program already exists.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=41149095011&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2008.tb01526.x
DO - 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2008.tb01526.x
M3 - Article
SN - 0025-729X
VL - 188
SP - 76
EP - 80
JO - Medical Journal of Australia
JF - Medical Journal of Australia
IS - 2
ER -