Searching for civil society: Changing patterns of governance in Britain

Mark Bevir*, Rod A.W. Rhodes

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    90 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    To understand governance, we ask who is telling the story from within which tradition. We argue there is no essentialist notion of governance but at least four conceptions each rooted in a distinctive tradition. The first section of the paper describes the relevant traditions: Tory, Liberal, Whig and Socialist. The second section describes the different notions of governance associated with each tradition; intermediate institutions, marketizing public services, reinventing the constitution and trust and negotiation. We explain these distinct conceptions of governance as responses to the dilemmas of inflation and state overload. In the conclusion, we summarize how and why traditions change, concluding, there is no such thing as governance, but only the differing constructions of the several traditions.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)41-62
    Number of pages22
    JournalPublic Administration
    Volume81
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2003

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Searching for civil society: Changing patterns of governance in Britain'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this