Seldom asked, seldom answered: Ii(b) or not ii(b)?

Colin Tatz*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    1 Citation (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Article II(b) of the UN Genocide Convention is rarely applied to a specific case in genocide studies. The Australian Aboriginal experience illustrates Article II(a) physical killing and II(e) child removal well enough. But in the longer term, II(b)-"causing serious bodily or mental harm"- has been the major process in destroying Aboriginal life and culture since the start of the twentieth century. The physical harm is readily detectable, but it is essentially the "serious mental harm"aspect that is examined here.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)216-227
    Number of pages12
    JournalGenocide Studies International
    Volume11
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2018

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Seldom asked, seldom answered: Ii(b) or not ii(b)?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this