Selection bias and moral hazard in the Australian private health insurance market: Evidence from the Queensland skin cancer database

Son Nghiem*, Nicholas Graves

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study estimates the effects of moral hazard and selection bias in private insurance by exploiting the unique characteristics of private health insurance in Australia using a longitudinal data of about 37,000 individuals. We estimate determinants of private health insurance status and health service consumption together as a system to control for individual unobserved effects. We also take into account the evolution of the health production process by controlling for the lagged dependent variables. We found that risk-averse individuals were more likely to purchase private health insurance, suggesting an advantageous selection. There is also evidence of ex-post moral hazard as privately insured individuals consumed more health services. Controlling for the lagged health service consumption reduces the magnitude of moral hazard considerably. The presence of advantageous selection and moral hazard in private health insurance indicates that the Australian healthcare system can be more efficient by increasing coverage and monitoring consumption.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)259-265
Number of pages7
JournalEconomic Analysis and Policy
Volume64
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2019
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Selection bias and moral hazard in the Australian private health insurance market: Evidence from the Queensland skin cancer database'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this