Self-esteem and social esteem: Is Adam Smith right?

Geoffrey Brennan*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    3 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    In Part III of The Theory of Moral Sentiments, Adam Smith declares that people desire to be both esteemed and to be esteem-worthy, but that the latter desire both does and ought to take priority. The main object of this paper is to challenge that priority claim - mainly in its descriptive aspect. If that claim were true, then: agents would be at pains to eliminate any distortions in their self-evaluations; and the effects of the size (especially of total secrecy) and the character of audience on behaviour would be second-order. Empirical evidence suggests otherwise. Moreover the normative claim seems to overlook some advantages of inflated self-evaluation; and to allow no independent room for norms of modesty/humility.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)302-315
    Number of pages14
    JournalHuman Affairs
    Volume30
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2020

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Self-esteem and social esteem: Is Adam Smith right?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this