Abstract
In Part III of The Theory of Moral Sentiments, Adam Smith declares that people desire to be both esteemed and to be esteem-worthy, but that the latter desire both does and ought to take priority. The main object of this paper is to challenge that priority claim - mainly in its descriptive aspect. If that claim were true, then: agents would be at pains to eliminate any distortions in their self-evaluations; and the effects of the size (especially of total secrecy) and the character of audience on behaviour would be second-order. Empirical evidence suggests otherwise. Moreover the normative claim seems to overlook some advantages of inflated self-evaluation; and to allow no independent room for norms of modesty/humility.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 302-315 |
| Number of pages | 14 |
| Journal | Human Affairs |
| Volume | 30 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Jul 2020 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Self-esteem and social esteem: Is Adam Smith right?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver