Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Selling the Farm Silver? Understanding Water Sales to the Australian Government

  • S. Wheeler*
  • , A. Zuo
  • , H. Bjornlund
  • , C. Lane Miller
  • *Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    52 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    In 2007-2008 the Australian federal government committed $3.1 billion over 10 years to purchase water from irrigators in the Murray-Darling Basin and to deliver this water to key environmental assets. Given that water entitlements often represent one of the most valuable assets owned by irrigators, this study investigates irrigators' willingness to sell water, and their actual water sales, to the government. It uses 1,570 surveys from 2008-2009 and 2010-2011 in the southern Murray-Darling Basin. Water sales can be classified as either last resort or strategic. Overall, the results suggest that farmers who do not hold strong traditional farming attitudes, and have higher debt, lower farm income, larger high security water entitlements, lower water allocations over the past 5 years, and those who have been net sellers of water allocations are more likely to have sold water or are thinking of selling water to the government. A dynamic comparison of how water sale preferences change, and an estimate of the total amount of water entitlements irrigators are willing to sell, indicates that it is probable that there will be enough water offered to the program in the future, at least to meet initial minimum environmental water targets. However, other concerns indicate that a potential restructure of the program may be required.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)133-154
    Number of pages22
    JournalEnvironmental and Resource Economics
    Volume52
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - May 2012

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Selling the Farm Silver? Understanding Water Sales to the Australian Government'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this