Sensitivity of plants to changing atmospheric CO2 concentration: From the geological past to the next century

Peter J. Franks*, Mark A. Adams, Jeffrey S. Amthor, Margaret M. Barbour, Joseph A. Berry, David S. Ellsworth, Graham D. Farquhar, Oula Ghannoum, Jon Lloyd, Nate McDowell, Richard J. Norby, David T. Tissue, Susanne von Caemmerer

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

    315 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    1The rate of CO2 assimilation by plants is directly influenced by the concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere, ca. As an environmental variable, ca also has a unique global and historic significance. Although relatively stable and uniform in the short term, global ca has varied substantially on the timescale of thousands to millions of years, and currently is increasing at seemingly an unprecedented rate. This may exert profound impacts on both climate and plant function. Here we utilise extensive datasets and models to develop an integrated, multi-scale assessment of the impact of changing ca on plant carbon dioxide uptake and water use. We find that, overall, the sensitivity of plants to rising or falling ca is qualitatively similar across all scales considered. It is characterised by an adaptive feedback response that tends to maintain 1 - ci/ca, the relative gradient for CO2 diffusion into the leaf, relatively constant. This is achieved through predictable adjustments to stomatal anatomy and chloroplast biochemistry. Importantly, the long-term response to changing ca can be described by simple equations rooted in the formulation of more commonly studied short-term responses.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1077-1094
    Number of pages18
    JournalNew Phytologist
    Volume197
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Mar 2013

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Sensitivity of plants to changing atmospheric CO2 concentration: From the geological past to the next century'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this