SET UP TO FAIL? EXAMINING AUSTRALIAN PAROLE COMPLIANCE LAWS THROUGH A THERAPEUTIC JURISPRUDENCE LENS

Max Henshaw, Lorana Bartels, Anthony Hopkins

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    4 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    With growing prisoner and parole numbers, Australia is demonstrably failing to reduce recidivism and facilitate desistance from crime. This paper examines Australia's parole compliance regime through the lens of therapeutic jurisprudence ('TJ'), which we argue provides a valuable perspective for understanding how these laws can operate to break or further entrench the cycle of recidivism. Our analysis indicates that these laws are not currently 'TJ-friendly', as parole boards have little engagement with offenders, breaches of parole conditions are often subject to disproportionate responses and there is no legislative obligation for jurisdictions to integrate support services for parolees.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)107-136
    Number of pages30
    JournalUniversity of Western Australia Law Review
    Volume45
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Jun 2019

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'SET UP TO FAIL? EXAMINING AUSTRALIAN PAROLE COMPLIANCE LAWS THROUGH A THERAPEUTIC JURISPRUDENCE LENS'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this