Setting health-care priorities: A reply to Tännsjö

Robert E. Goodin*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    5 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    This paper firstly distinguishes between principles of "global justice" that apply the same anywhere and everywhere - Tännsjö's utilitarianism, egalitarianism, prioritarianism and such like - and principles of "local justice" that apply within the specific sphere of health-care. Sometimes the latter might just be a special case of the former - but not always. Secondly, it discusses reasons, many psychological in nature, why physicians might devote excessive resources to prolonging life pointlesslv, showing once again that those reasons might themselves be morally significant.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)24-32
    Number of pages9
    JournalDiametros
    Volume18
    Issue number68
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2021

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Setting health-care priorities: A reply to Tännsjö'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this