TY - JOUR
T1 - Setting semantics
T2 - Conceptual set can determine the physical properties that capture attention
AU - Goodhew, Stephanie C.
AU - Kendall, William
AU - Ferber, Susanne
AU - Pratt, Jay
PY - 2014/8
Y1 - 2014/8
N2 - The ability of a stimulus to capture visuospatial attention depends on the interplay between its bottom-up saliency and its relationship to an observer's top-down control set, such that stimuli capture attention if they match the predefined properties that distinguish a searched-for target from distractors (Folk, Remington, & Johnston, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 18, 1030-1044 1992). Despite decades of research on this phenomenon, however, the vast majority has focused exclusively on matches based on low-level physical properties. Yet if contingent capture is indeed a "top-down" influence on attention, then semantic content should be accessible and able to determine which physical features capture attention. Here we tested this prediction by examining whether a semantically defined target could create a control set for particular features. To do this, we had participants search to identify a target that was differentiated from distractors by its meaning (e.g., the word "red" among color words all written in black). Before the target array, a cue was presented, and it was varied whether the cue appeared in the physical color implied by the target word. Across three experiments, we found that cues that embodied the meaning of the word produced greater cuing than cues that did not. This suggests that top-down control sets activate content that is semantically associated with the target-defining property, and this content in turn has the ability to exogenously orient attention.
AB - The ability of a stimulus to capture visuospatial attention depends on the interplay between its bottom-up saliency and its relationship to an observer's top-down control set, such that stimuli capture attention if they match the predefined properties that distinguish a searched-for target from distractors (Folk, Remington, & Johnston, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 18, 1030-1044 1992). Despite decades of research on this phenomenon, however, the vast majority has focused exclusively on matches based on low-level physical properties. Yet if contingent capture is indeed a "top-down" influence on attention, then semantic content should be accessible and able to determine which physical features capture attention. Here we tested this prediction by examining whether a semantically defined target could create a control set for particular features. To do this, we had participants search to identify a target that was differentiated from distractors by its meaning (e.g., the word "red" among color words all written in black). Before the target array, a cue was presented, and it was varied whether the cue appeared in the physical color implied by the target word. Across three experiments, we found that cues that embodied the meaning of the word produced greater cuing than cues that did not. This suggests that top-down control sets activate content that is semantically associated with the target-defining property, and this content in turn has the ability to exogenously orient attention.
KW - Attention: selective
KW - Attentional capture
KW - Automaticity
KW - Cognitive control
KW - Contingent capture
KW - Embodied cognition
KW - Semantics
KW - Spatial attention
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84906355911&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3758/s13414-014-0686-3
DO - 10.3758/s13414-014-0686-3
M3 - Article
SN - 1943-3921
VL - 76
SP - 1577
EP - 1589
JO - Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics
JF - Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics
IS - 6
ER -